By entering this hauntedamericatours.com - Haunted America Tours web site, in exchange for use of this web site, you the user hereby agree to the following:
The content of this web site is for mature viewers only and may not be suitable for minors. If you are a minor or it is illegal for you to view nudity or mature images and language, do not proceed.
This site is presented to you AS IS, with no warranty, express or implied. By clicking "I Agree" and then viewing our site, you agree not to hold the webmaster and staff of this site hauntedamericatours.com - Haunted America Tours liable for any damages from your use of these pages.
As a condition of using this site, you must fully read and understand, and comply with the rules of this site, which may be located by following the "Rules" link on the home page hauntedamericatours.com - Haunted America Tours.
Paranormal Ghost filled tales of voodoo - hoodoo and zombies, Bigfoot, El chupacabra, Banshee's, witches, ghost hunting Cemeteries, the undead, the dead, Cryptids, Vampires, ghouls , Monsters, Ufo's, Haunted Locations, Haunted Buildings, People and objects, Paranormal Phenomena and strange Urban Legends perpetrate a type of folklore or "Fakelore," endlessly circulated by word of mouth through generations, repeated in television news stories, Documentaries, Radio Talk shows, Newspapers, Blogs, magazine articles and distributed by e-mail.
hauntedamericatours.com is not responsible for the views or content expressed by individuals in their articles we post them as is, be warned some may contain adult theme language, video or images.
Yes they are even often found on many web sites such as this one. Please be fore warned, that not everything you read is the truth! This site is expressly for entertainment purposes only. Disclaimer: Domain owner maintains no relationship with third party advertisers. Reference to any specific service or trademark is not controlled by domain owner and does not constitute or imply its association, endorsement or recommendation.
And such is the Tales of all that is paranormal in the World.
DID YOU FIND WHAT YOUR SEARCHING FOR? IF NOT SEARCH OUR SITE AND LEARN
MORE ABOUT THE MOST HAUNTED SCARIEST PLACES IN THE WORLD HERE.
Taken from first-person accounts and historical documents, this book chronicles more than 300 examples of alien encounters, conspiracy theories, and the influence of extraterrestrials on human events throughout history. Investigating claims of visits from otherworldly creatures, aliens living among us, abductions of humans to alien spacecraft, and accounts of interstellar cooperation since the UFO crash in Roswell, this discussion of the theories and mysteries surrounding aliens is packed with thought-provoking stories and shocking revelations of alien involvement in the lives of Earthling
Bram Stoker’s novel “Dracula”
is written in the “espistolary”
style as a collection of journal entries,
letters, and telegrams exchanged between
the main characters; fictional newspaper
clippings help to round out the story.
This literary style was almost outdated
by the time “Dracula” was
published in 1897 but was familiar to
most late-nineteenth century audiences
who appreciated the sense of realism
and urgency this provided.
No one is certain why Stoker chose a
little-known fifteenth century Romanian
prince as the model for his main character,
but scholars have concluded that Stoker
had at least a peripheral knowledge
of his character as well as the subject
matter. Stoker is also said to have
maintained a close friendship with Hermann
Vamberger, a Hungarian professor from
the University of Budapest, and many
suspect this to be the author’s
true source of information about Dragwyla’s
life and history. In fact, Vamberger,
whose name in his native Hungarian is
actually Arminius Vambery, appears in
the novel as an absent friend of Dr.
Abraham Van Helsing who mentions his
“friend Arminius” as the
source of his knowledge about Dracula;
this seems to support the hypothesis.
Nevertheless, it should not be overlooked
that Stoker’s novel is, in fact,
the only real link between the historical
Vlad “Dracul” (1431-1476)
and the vampire as it appears in modern
culture. In fact, Stoker’s creature
is actually a composite drawn from several
different folklore traditions as well
as historic references and materials
that were available to the author at
the time the novel was written but which
are unfortunately lost to us.
Stoker’s 1897 novel has been the
basis for countless films, plays and
theatrical treatments, and even for
comedies, musicals and popular television
characters such as Al Newman’s
“Grandpa” on the late-sixties
sitcom “The Munsters.”
Over the years seemingly numberless
adaptations and retellings have been
made of Stoker’s original novel
– some good, some really bad with
the occasional shot at excellence breaking
from the rest. Three of the most famous
film treatments of the 1897 work are
“Nosferatu” (1922); the
infamous Universal studios film “Dracula”
(1931) which perhaps single-handedly
shaped the image of the vampire for
generations to come; and Francis Ford
Coppola’s excellent, if flawed,
“Bram Stoker’s Dracula”
(1992).
“Nosferatu,” infamous for
its silent, haunting atmosphere and
the gaunt Max Schrek as the preying
vampire, was almost never made because
it was produced while Stoker’s
widow was still alive. Awash in copyright
controversy, the producers opted to
change the location (what appears to
be Transylvania is really Slovakia)
and the character names (Count Dracula
become Count Orlok) to avoid lawsuits.
Notwithstanding all these challenges,
“Nosferatu” stands at the
forefront as one of the creepiest treatments
the novel has ever received on film.
Unlike film adaptations to follow which
would ultimately create a more romantic
and tragic Dracula, the vampire of “Nosferatu”
is nothing like his sensuous and erotic
successors. This creature embodies and
brings to life reviled memories from
Europe’s collective horror memory
and thus we see the Count as more of
a walking corpse, bloodless, lifeless,
with a rat-like face, elongated ears,
and sharp teeth and nails. His halting
gait and relentless lust for blood are
more like a Dans Macabre come to life
than the vampires we have come to know
(and sometimes love) in more recent
adaptations, having many of the hallmarks
of traditional European vampires.
Though often camped and imitated over
the years, as the vampire has made his
way deep into the heart of modern American
culture, this nosferatu stands apart
as a very bad thing, indeed, to come
across on a dark and moonless night.
To watch the full movie version of director
F.W. Munarau’s fantastically eerie
“Nosferatu” follow this
link:
www.clickcaster.com
Perhaps no film treatment of Stoker’s
work has done more to cement the image
of the vampire in the world zeitgeist
than 1931’s “Dracula”
starring Bela Lugosi.
Here the bloodsucking Transylvania Count
becomes a larger-than-death caricature
of the novel’s villain, ramped
up to meet the expectations of Depression-era
filmgoers. Responding to the public
need for extraordinary escapism from
the melancholy reality of American life
in the early 1930’s, Universal
introduces the aristocratic vampire
complete with tuxedo and cumber bund,
flowing cape, and slicked-back black
hair; this Count reeks more of money
than of the grave.
Despite
the fact that at the time the film was
made Lugosi could only barely speak
English (he learned his lines phonetically,
responding to cues) he nevertheless
fit the bill as just what the public
wanted in their anti-hero heroes. Mostly
required to stand about looking menacing
and austere, accompanied by the obligatory
bats and fog, Lugosi’s treatment
was immediately etched upon the public
psyche. If there was such a thing as
a vampire – not impossible in
a world gone seemingly to hell –
then THIS is surely how he must look
and act.
Thanks
to Lugosi’s hammy acting skills
and Hollywood’s clout, this image
– the aristocratic Transylvanian
count – would be the most enduring
film image of Stoker’s original
Dracula. Generations the world over
immediately recognized the flowing cape
and black evening dress of the Lugosi
vampire and over the years it has been
redone and revamped by everyone from
Christopher Lee to George Hamilton and
by countless Halloween partygoers in
between.
For more information on “Dracula”
and other Universal monster classics,
follow the link, below:
In 1992 Francis Ford Coppola, the brilliant
director who brought us the Godfather
films and who now puts fine dinner wines
on our table, took a stab at Stoker’s
novel. The result was his film adaptation
“Bram Stoker’s Dracula.”
Coppola
chose the amazing Gary Oldman to portray
Count Dracula as a more sympathetic
and sadly romantic figure that was at
once similar to but different from every
previous interpretation. Coppola made
the book’s count into a Prince
and added to or expanded on many of
the folkloric aspects of the book’s
vampire, including his power to control
animals and to affect the weather. Coppola’s
version also gives Dracula a love interest
in the form of Johnathan Harker’s
wife, Mina, whom we discover to be the
reincarnation of the princess who leapt
to her death from the top of Poenari
Castle. This plot addition makes Dracula
immediately more tragic and his demise
more poignant. In most other regards,
Coppola adheres to the book as written
by Stoker and the adaptation works surprisingly
well, giving us ultimately a Count whose
horrible acts can be judged against
a backdrop of tragedy and loss.
Besides
this, Coppola’s version gives
us three of the most beautiful and seductive
Vampire Brides ever put on screen; sexy,
clad in stained, decaying shrouds, they
appear to have stepped directly out
of Eastern European folklore and into
the film. Add to this Coppola’s
attention to traditional details in
creating a realistically creepy and
foreign atmosphere and this 1992 adaptation
far outranks anything that came before
it.
As
a footnote, this film single-handedly
caused the clip-on spectacle and monocle
markets to soar as hundreds of Gary
Oldman wanna-be’s sought to recreate
his vampire look. After this everything
from broody Goths to failed, fire-eating
magicians just HAD to have a pair of
those “cool” glasses …
The Vampire Motif in Fiction
“The modern vampire of …
fiction and the media has come to be
seen as an appealing, seductive figure
who offers eternal life in exchange
for a voluptuous, quasi-sexual sharing
of blood. It’s no wonder that
people find the image an attractive
one, even to the point of trying to
adopt it for themselves.”
Greer
Films and plays may come and go, but
in the literary world there is only
one work of fiction that can stand in
comparison to Bram Stoker’s “Dracula”
– and this work itself owes a
lot to the 1897 classic. We are talking,
of course, about “The Vampire
Chronicles” of novelist Anne Rice.
MARK OF THE VAMPIRE trailer
Besides
“Dracula” itself, no other
work of fiction has had more of an impact
on shapingthe
concept of the vampire in modern culture.
From
its beginning with the publication of
“Interview with the Vampire,”
Rice’s Vampire Chronicles have
taken the reader on a fantastic roller-coaster
ride over, under and sideways through
the world of the Undead. With the preternatural
anti-hero element embodied in the undead
rebel Lestat, Rice has woven a tale
so deep and vivid that it has quite
literally spawned an entire subculture
of would-be and wanna-be vampires that
thrives across the world to this day.
The
fact that Rice’s vampires are
simply extrapolations on the Stoker
theme apparently seems lost on her minions
of followers who have adopted the look,
dress, mannerisms and habits (good and
bad) of Rice’s characters and
who live out the fantasy of a dark and
brooding pre-Victoriana aristocracy
of the undead in their daily lives.
This vision of the Dracula mythos, although
true to the characterizations of Stoker
and Rice, is nonetheless entirely removed
from the real vampires that actually
lurk among us. It does prove, however,
the power of literature to create cultural
motifs and its ability to sustain those
motifs so strongly that these actually
become – despite all proof to
the contrary – a widely accepted
concept of reality for many people.
Other
writers have tackled the realm of the
undead with more or less success, but
none have made such a lasting contribution
to this, the Gothic literary genre,
than Stoker and Rice. It would take
generations of argument to undo the
alternative vampire reality that they
have created and unless the decision
is based on an encounter or experience
with a REAL vampire, very few who have
adopted this lifestyle will readily
give it up for what passes as our reality.
It
is safe to say, therefore, that no matter
how erroneous they may be, the Dracula
and vampire myths will be with us for
a long, long time.
“.
. . reality is a good deal less pleasant.
Actual vampires are about as appealing
as bubonic plague and as seductive as
bloodsucking leeches. A predatory ghost
who murders people to prolong its own
unnatural existence, the vampire is
perhaps the least attractive and most
destructive of all monsters. All the
other [monstrous] entities … even
those that are highly dangerous to human
beings, can be dealt with in ways that
stop short of annihilation – by
means of magical protections and banishings,
ordinary caution, or a simple willingness
to live and let live. No t so the vampire:
it must be destroyed or it will kill,
over and over again.
In
order to make sense of the vampire,
then, the first and most crucial step
is to forget everything you think you
already know about vampires …
”
Greer
COMMENTARY
“The Shadow of Lugosi’s
Cape Reaches Far”
Far from all the posing and play-acting,
and far from the maddening whir of the
everyday world, the fact remains that
vampires DO exist. True, they do not
appear in our reality as anything like
the Hollywood or literary icons, but
they are there.
So,
if we don’t have the benefit of
the long black cape and thick Eastern
European accent to guide us, or the
mysterious preternatural (a word entirely
overused where vampires are concerned)
gaze and beautiful, lanky frame of Lestat
just isn’t the real thing, how
do we know when we’ve encountered
a real, bona fide vampire?
There
are experts who agree that most vampires
exist because they are “willed”
into being. When dealing with a vampire,
it is important to remember that you
are dealing with the manifest will of
a very powerful magician or witch who
has made a magical grasp “aimed
at personal immortality” and who
will not be easily dismissed or destroyed.
These
creatures are certainly not the vampiric
clones that populate the literary and
Hollywood mythology and as such they
cannot be dealt with by anyone who is
in the least enamored of the vampire
state or who does not have a firm grasp
on the reality or on the dangerous nature
of the creature itself.
That
vampires and vampiric spirits are the
product of magical workings has long
been known in the occult community,
although the methods of constructing
the vampiric etheric revenant are high
up on most magicians’ list of
“knowledge better off forgotten.”
Still there persist in the magical community
those who, for one reason or another,
resist entirely the death process and
opt instead to deliberately evade death
in such a way that “their souls
stay within reach of the world of the
living.”
Ghosts,
it is said, fall into this state by
accident. With vampires, the condition
is intentional and it has been found
in many cases that would-be vampires
begin the process of evading death even
while still alive, using exercises to
strengthen the etheric body, “helping
it to resist the disintegrating processes
of … death.” In other cases,
certain types of magical practices strengthen
the etheric body by default, and increase
the possibility that one might become
a vampire. Another example, widely expressed
in the axiom “too mean to die,”
becomes reality when a soul who is so
mean and hateful and grasping in life
refuses to let go in the death process;
hanging onto the imitation of life found
in the twilight state of death, these
souls join the ranks of the true “undead.”
Once in a vampiric state, the soul,
or etheric revenant, will continue to
seek out energy to sustain it most notably
from living human beings. Much like
the bloodsucking vampires of fiction
and movies, the true vampire will prey
upon the energy of its victims and bring
about the same state of malaise and
general illness that is traditionally
associated with vampire attacks.
As
long as the actual body of the vampire
is intact, and the etheric link is not
otherwise broken, the creature will
continue to prey and grow strong until
its danger to humans matches its desperation
to stay alive. This is why most authentic
vampire traditions require that the
corpse of the suspected vampire be subjected
to such horrible methods of destruction
– to assure that there is nothing
left to form a link for the vampire’s
spirit. The corpse of a suspected vampire
is thus often beheaded, even dismembered,
and then summarily burned. Often these
acts follow numerous others that, though
not as grisly, generally only serve
to confuse but not destroy the creature.
In
modern times, finding a vampire with
an intact body and a strong etheric
link is rare, especially owing to modern
funeral and burial customs. However,
this does not prevent the birth of vampires
among us because, as stated above, if
the will of the dying soul is strong
enough it may cling to life long after
the natural process of decay has passed.
When this occurs, the vampire is technically
more like a ghost, but a predatory ghost
animated by an independent will that
is so powerful and so intent on survival
that it has found a way to transcend
death itself.
Despite
this, however, the vampire’s existence
is a precarious one and one that is
daily becoming less and less viable.
In many instances nowadays what is thought
to be a true vampire is identified as
an angry ghost. Nevertheless, the existence
of vampires should not be doubted because
they are still among us, albeit in varied
forms, and are still quite able to suck
the very life from us.
Some
experts have hypothesized that modern
vampires are actually spirit larvae
that have evolved into a more substantial
form. Others believe that, as stated
above, the firm, directed will of a
powerful worker of magic can and often
does avoid the death process entirely,
only to find that it cannot maintain
this state without making prey of the
humans it finds peopling its twilight
world.
Still
others warn about a more real and deadly
vampire than any thus far mentioned.
This is the living “psychic vampire,”
or living individuals who indulge in
the same actions as true vampires –
that is, feeding on the etheric energy
of everyone around them. Though their
“attacks” are not as drastic
as those of an actual vampire, they
nonetheless can produce states of ill-health
and exhaustion in their victims.
Many
people become psychic vampires by accident
and don’t even realize they are
feeding on the energy of healthy individuals
around them. Others, especially individuals
who have some knowledge of magic or
the manipulation of the etheric realm,
and yet have no actual intent of becoming
a vampire in death, will prey on the
energy of people around them simply
because, by virtue of their higher understanding
of the process, they can.
When
such an individual dies, however, there
is a good chance that he or she may
become a vampire, the living etheric
revenant who resists the death process
intentionally and clings to a shadow
of life by sucking the life force and
etheric energy from everyone around
them until something happens to break
the link and total death finally occurs.
Viewed
in this light, there are probably not
many of us who need to go to the movies
or rent a DVD to get our fill of really
scary vampires. Most likely every one
of us can think of just such a person
in their daily life.
Is there such a vampire in your reality?
Could very well be.
Bram Stoker (1847-1912) studied at Trinity
College in Dublin, Ireland. He earned
a degree in science (with honors) in
1868 and a master's degree in mathematics
in 1872. Stoker began work as a civil
servant at Dublin Castle in 1868. He
also worked as an unpaid drama critic
for the Dublin Evening Mail, and later,
as a business manager of the Lyceum
Theatre. Stoker's first book, The Duties
of Clerks of Petty Sessions in Ireland,
was published in 1879. His short story
collection, Under the Sunset, was published
in 1882. In 1892, Stoker began writing
Dracula. Stoker's childhood illness,
which had hysteria-like symptoms, may
have led him to imagine the predicament
he would later create for his vampire
victims.
Between
1878 and 1898 Stoker managed the world-famous
London Lyceum Theatre, where he supplemented
his income by writing a large number
of sensational novels, his most famous
being the vampire tale Dracula published
on May 18, 1897. Parts of it are set
around the town of Whitby, where he
was living at the time. While Dracula
is famous today (due in large part to
its 20th century life on film), it was
not an important or famous work for
Victorian readers, being just another
pot-boiler adventure among many. Throughout
the 1880s and 1890s authors such as
H. Rider Haggard, Rudyard Kipling, Robert
Louis Stevenson, Arthur Conan Doyle,
and H.G. Wells wrote many tales in which
fantastic creatures threatened the British
Empire. Invasion literature was at a
peak, and Stoker's formula of an invasion
of England by continental European influences
was by 1897 very familiar to readers
of fantastic adventure stories.
Shakespearian
actor and friend of Stoker's, Sir Henry
Irving was a real-life inspiration for
the character of Dracula, tailor-made
to his dramatic presence, gentlemanly
mannerisms and speciality playing villain
roles. Irving however never agreed to
play the part on stage.
Enlarge
Shakespearian
actor and friend of Stoker's, Sir Henry
Irving was a real-life inspiration for
the character of Dracula, tailor-made
to his dramatic presence, gentlemanly
mannerisms and speciality playing villain
roles. Irving however never agreed to
play the part on stage.
Before
writing Dracula, Stoker spent seven
years researching European folklore
and stories of vampires, being most
influenced by Emily Gerard's 1885 essay
"Transylvania Superstitions".
Though it is the most famous vampire
novel ever, Dracula was not the first.
It was preceded and partially inspired
by Sheridan Le Fanu's 1871 Carmilla,
about a lesbian vampire who preys upon
a lonely young woman. The image of a
vampire portrayed as an aristocratic
man, like the character of Dracula,
was created by John Polidori in The
Vampyre (1819), during the summer spent
with Frankenstein creator Mary Shelley
and other friends in 1816. Polidori
is many times credited as the creator
of the vampire genre in fiction, but
his vampire story was inspired by elements
of Lord Byron's vampire poem, The Giaour
(1813).
The Lyceum
Theatre where Stoker worked between
1878 and 1898 was headed by the tyrannical
actor-manager Henry Irving, who was
Stoker's real-life inspiration for the
mannerisms of Dracula, and who Stoker
hoped would play Dracula in a stage
version. Although Irving never did agree
to do a stage version, Dracula's dramatic
sweeping gestures and gentlemanly mannerisms
drew their living embodiment from Irving.
The Dead
Un-Dead was one of Stoker's original
titles for Dracula, and up until a few
weeks before publication, the manuscript
was titled simply The Un-Dead. The name
of Stoker's count was originally going
to be Count Vampyre, but while doing
research Stoker ran across an intriguing
word in the Romanian language: "Dracul",
meaning "the Devil". There
was also a historic figure known as
Vlad the Impaler, but whether or not
Stoker based his character on him remains
debated (see "Historical connections"
below).
Dracula
is an epistolary novel, written as collection
of diary entries, telegrams, and letters
from the characters, as well as fictional
clippings from the Whitby and London
newspapers. This literary style, made
most famous by one of the most popular
novels of the 19th century, The Woman
in White (1860), was considered rather
old-fashioned by the time of the publication
of Dracula, but it adds a sense of realism
and provides the reader with the perspective
of most of the major characters.
Dracula
has been the basis for countless films
and plays. Three of the most famous
are Nosferatu (1922), Dracula (1931),
and Bram Stoker's Dracula (1992). Nosferatu
was produced while Stoker's widow was
still alive, and the filmmakers were
forced to change the setting and the
names of the characters for copyright
reasons. The vampire in Nosferatu is
called Count Orlok rather than Count
Dracula. Bram Stoker's Dracula, while
closer to the novel's plot than most
movies produced earlier (or since),
reimagines the Count as a tragic figure
instead of a monster. It adds an opening
sequence that focuses on the Count's
Romanian background, and inserts a new
romantic subplot into the story.
Stoker
wrote several other novels dealing with
horror and supernatural themes, but
none achieved the lasting fame or success
of Dracula. His other novels include
The Snake's Pass (1890), The Jewel of
Seven Stars (1903), and The Lair of
the White Worm (1911).
The story
begins with Jonathan Harker, a newly-qualified
English solicitor, being invited to
the Count's crumbling, remote castle
(situated in the Carpathian Mountains,
on the border of Transylvania and Moldavia),
to provide legal support for a real
estate transaction on behalf of Harker's
employer in London. At first seduced
by the Count's gracious manner, he soon
discovers he has become a prisoner and
begins to see disquieting facets of
the Count's daily life. Searching for
a way out of the castle one night, he
falls under the spell of three wanton
female vampires, the Brides of Dracula,
but is saved at the last minute by the
Count who wants to retain Harker as
a friend to teach him about London,
where the Count plans to travel among
the "teeming millions". Harker
barely escapes from the castle with
his life.
DRACULA
THE FICTION
Not long
afterward, a Russian ship runs aground
during a fierce tempest, on the shores
of Whitby, a coastal town in England.
All passengers and crew are dead. A
huge dog or wolf is seen running from
the ship, which contains nothing but
boxes of dirt from Transylvania: Count
Dracula, in his animal form, has arrived
in England.
Soon
the Count is menacing Harker's devoted
fiancée, Wilhelmina "Mina"
Murray, and her vivacious friend, Lucy
Westenra. Lucy receives three marriage
proposals in one day, from Arthur Holmwood
(Lord Godalming); an American cowboy,
Quincey Morris; and an asylum psychiatrist,
Dr. John Seward. There is a notable
encounter between Dracula and Seward's
patient Renfield, an insane man who
means to consume insects, spiders, and
birds, and other creatures — in
ascending order of size — in order
to absorb their "life force".
Renfield acts as a kind of motion sensor,
detecting the proximity of Dracula and
releasing clues accordingly.
Lucy
begins to waste away suspiciously. All
of her suitors fret and Seward calls
in his old teacher, Professor Abraham
Van Helsing from Amsterdam. Van Helsing
immediately determines the cause of
Lucy's condition, but refuses to disclose
it, knowing that Seward's faith in him
will be shaken if he starts spouting
off about vampires. Van Helsing tries
multiple blood transfusions, but they
are clearly losing ground. On a night
when Van Helsing must return to Amsterdam
(and his message to Seward asking him
to watch the Westenra household is accidentally
sent to the wrong address), Lucy and
her mother are attacked in the night
by a wolf. Mrs Westenra, who has a heart
condition, dies of fright, and Lucy
herself apparently dies soon after.
Lucy
is buried, but soon afterward the newspapers
report a "bloofer lady" (sometimes
explained as "beautiful lady")
stalking children in the night. Van
Helsing, knowing that this means Lucy
has become a vampire, confides in Seward,
Arthur, and Morris. The suitors and
Van Helsing track her down, and after
a disturbing confrontation between her
vampiric self and Arthur, they stake
her heart and behead her.
Around
the same time, Jonathan Harker arrives
home from Transylvania (where Mina joined
and married him after his escape from
the castle); he and Mina also join the
coalition, who now turn their attentions
to dealing with Dracula himself.
After
Dracula learns of Van Helsing and the
others' plot against him, he takes revenge
by visiting -- and biting -- Mina at
least three times. Dracula also feeds
Mina his blood, creating a mind bond
between them, aiming to control her.
The only way to forestall this is to
kill Dracula first. Mina slowly succumbs
to the blood of the vampire that flows
through her veins, switching back and
forth from a state of consciousness
to a state of semi-trance during which
she is telepathically connected with
Dracula. It is this connection which
they start to use to track Dracula's
movements.
Dracula
flees back to his castle in Transylvania,
followed by Van Helsing's gang, who
manage to track him down just before
sundown and kill him by "shearing
through the kneck" and stabbing
him in the heart with a bowie knife.
Dracula crumbles to dust, his spell
is lifted and Mina freed from the marks.
Quincey Morris is killed in the final
battle, stabbed by gypsies; the survivors
return to England.
The book
closes with a note about Mina's and
Jonathan's married life and the birth
of their first-born son, whom they name
Quincey in remembrance of their American
friend.
WATCH
THE ENTIRE MOVIE 1922 ORIGINAL MOVIE
NOSFERATU HERE FREE
Nosferatu
(1922)
Originally
released in 1922 as Nosferatu, Eine
Symphonie Des Grauens, director F.W.
Munarau's chilling and eerie ... all
» adaption of Stoker's Dracula
is a silent masterpiece of terror which
to this day is the most striking and
frightening portrayal of the legend.
Director:
F.W. Murnau
vam·pire
n. [French, from German Vampir, of
Slavic origin.] A reanimated corpse
that is believed to rise from the
grave at night to suck the blood of
sleeping people.
This
was the first film of the production
company Prana-Film GmbH; it was also
the last as they declared bankruptcy
after Bram Stoker's estate—acting
for his widow, Florence Stoker—sued
for copyright infringement (plagiarism)
and won. The court ordered all existing
prints of Nosferatu destroyed, but
a number of copies of the film had
already been distributed around the
world. These prints were then copied
over the years, resulting in Nosferatu
gaining a reputation as one of the
greatest movie adaptations of the
vampire legend.
With
the influence of producer and production
designer, Albin Grau, the film established
one of two main lines of vampire depiction
in movies. The "Nosferatu-type"
is a living corpse with rodent features
(especially elongated fingernails
and incisors), associated with rats
and plague, and neither charming nor
erotic but totally repugnant. The
victims usually die and are not turned
into vampires themselves. The more
common other line is the "Dracula-type"
(established by Bela Lugosi's version
of Dracula and perpetuated by Christopher
Lee), a charming aristocrat adept
at seduction and turning his victims
into new vampires.
Parts
of the film allegedly showing Transylvania
were filmed in Slovakia. Nosferatu's
castle, for instance, is Orava Castle
in northern Slovakia, and other locations
are in the High Tatras and on the
Váh River around Strecno Castle.
Historical
places connected to Vlad Tepes are
publicised under a Dracula theme catering
largely, but not entirely, to foreign
markets. Bran Castle, which has only
a very tangential connection with
the historical Vlad Tepes, now exaggerates
that connection and promotes itself
as "Dracula's Castle". [3]
A dungeon-themed disco, catering to
a mostly Romanian crowd and located
in the basement of a former inn immediately
adjacent to the Curtea Veche ("Old
Court") -- onetime site of Vlad
Tepes' castle in Bucharest -- calls
itself by the English-language name
"Impaler". The well-preserved
medieval town of Sighisoara, Vlad
Tepes's birthplace, seriously considered
building a Dracula theme park on the
edge of town, but in the end it was
decided that such a site would cheapen
the beauty and history of the medieval
city and the plan was blocked. The
park was then to have been built close
to Bucharest (the capital, which is
nowhere near Transylvania) but plans
have subsequently been scrapped.
The
character of Count Dracula has remained
popular over the years, and many films
have used the character as a villain,
while others have referenced him in
movie titles such as Daughters of
Dracula, Lady Dracula, and Zoltan,
Hound of Dracula. An estimated 160
films (as of 2004) feature Dracula
in a major role, a number second only
to Sherlock Holmes. The total number
of films that include a reference
to Dracula may reach as high as 649
movies, according to the Internet
Movie Database.
Most
tellings of the Dracula story include
not only the Count, but the rest of
the "cast": Jonathan and
Mina Harker, Van Helsing, and Renfield.
(Notably, the novel roles of characters
Jonathan Harker and Renfield are more
than occasionally reversed or combined,
as are the roles of Mina and Lucy.
Quincey Morris is usually omitted
entirely.)
One
of the first film adaptations of Stoker's
story actually caused Stoker's estate
to sue for copyright infringement.
In 1922, silent film director F. W.
Murnau made a horror film called Nosferatu:
eine Symphonie des Grauens ('Nosferatu:
A Symphony of Horror'), which took
the story of Dracula and set it in
Transylvania and Germany. In the story,
Dracula's role was changed to that
of Count Orlok, one of the most hideous
versions of the vampire ever to be
created for a movie, played by Max
Schreck (whose name literally means
'fright').
The
Stoker estate won its lawsuit and
all existing prints of Nosferatu were
ordered to be destroyed. However,
a number of pirated copies of the
movie survived to the present era,
where they entered the public domain.
Nosferatu was also remade in 1979
by Werner Herzog.
In
1927 the story was adapted for the
Broadway stage by Hamilton Deane and
John L. Balderston and starred Bela
Lugosi (Hungarian-born actor) and
Edward Van Sloan as the Count and
Van Helsing respectively. Lugosi initially
learned his lines phonetically.
The
1931 film version of Dracula starred
Bela Lugosi and was directed by Tod
Browning. It is one of the most famous
versions of the story and is commonly
considered a horror classic. In 2000
the United States Library of Congress
deemed the film "culturally significant"
and selected it for preservation in
the National Film Registry. It is
an adaptation of the 1927 play and
Van Sloan also transferred his role
to the big screen. The films only
had music during the opening and closing
credits. In 1999 Philip Glass was
commissioned to compose a musical
score to accompany the film. The current
DVD release allows access to this
music.
Bela
Lugosi Interview - Ship's Reporter
(1950)
At
the same time as the 1931 Lugosi film
a Spanish language version was filmed
for release in Mexico. It was filmed
at night using the same sets as the
Tod Browning production with a different
cast and crew (a common practice in
the early days of sound films). George
Melford's was the director and it
starred Carlos Villarías as
the Count, Eduardo Arozamena as Van
Helsing and Lupita Tovar as Eva.
Due
to America's censorship laws, Melford's
Dracula contains scenes that could
not be put in the final cut of the
more familiar English version. There
is considerable debate among fans
over which film is better. Fans of
Melford's version say the acting of
the Spanish version is crisper and
the pace is much quicker -- and there
aren't any hammy close-ups of Lugosi.
It is also included on the available
DVD.
During
the era of the 1930s and 1940s, the
Universal Studios horror films made
Dracula a household name by starring
him as a villain in a number of movies,
including several where he met other
monsters (the most famous of which
is the comedy Abbott and Costello
Meet Frankenstein in which Lugosi
played Dracula on film for only the
second and final time.)
Universal
Studios productions of Dracula
The
Universal Studios films in which Dracula
(or a relative) appeared (and the
actor portraying the character) were:
1.
Dracula (1931 - Bela Lugosi. A second
version was filmed simultaneously
in Spanish, with Carlos Villar as
Dracula)
2. Dracula's Daughter (1936 - Gloria
Holden)
3. Son of Dracula (1943 - Lon Chaney,
Jr.)
4. House of Frankenstein (1944 - John
Carradine)
5. House of Dracula (1945 - Carradine)
6. Bud Abbott Lou Costello Meet Frankenstein
(1948 - Lugosi. This film is usually
known as Abbott and Costello Meet
Frankenstein, however the title given
here is the official on-screen title
according to the Internet Movie Database.)
7. Van Helsing (2004 - Richard Roxburgh)
In
1938, Orson Welles and John Houseman
chose Dracula to be the inaugural
episode of the new radio show featuring
their Broadway production company,
The Mercury Theatre on the Air. The
adaptation was faithful to the book,
although condensed to fit in the show's
hour-long format. Welles was the voice
of Dracula.
Hammer
Films productions of Dracula
In
1958, Hammer Films produced Dracula
(1958), a newer, more Gothic version
of the story, starring Christopher
Lee as Dracula and Peter Cushing as
Van Helsing. It is widely considered
to be one of the best versions of
the story to be adapted to film, and
in 2004 was named by the magazine
Total Film as the 30th greatest British
film of all time. Although it takes
many liberties with the novel's plot,
the creepy atmosphere and charismatic
performance of Lee make it memorable
and favored. It was released in the
United States as Horror of Dracula
to avoid confusion with the earlier
Lugosi version. This was followed
by a long series of Dracula films,
usually featuring Lee as Dracula.
The
Hammer films in which Dracula (or
a relative) appeared (and the actor
portraying the character) were:
1.
Dracula (1958) - Christopher Lee.
Released in the US as Horror of Dracula
2. The Brides of Dracula (1960 - David
Peel as Dracula disciple Baron Meinster)
3. Dracula: Prince of Darkness (1966
- Lee)
4. Dracula Has Risen from the Grave
(1968 - Lee)
5. Taste the Blood of Dracula (1969
- Lee)
6. Scars of Dracula (1970 - Lee)
7. Dracula A.D. 1972 (1972 - Lee)
8. The Satanic Rites of Dracula (1973
- Lee). Released in the US as Count
Dracula and His Vampire Bride
9. The Legend of the Seven Golden
Vampires (1974 - John Forbes-Robertson).
Variously released as The Seven Brothers
Meet Dracula and Dracula and the Seven
Golden Vampires
Other
productions 1967 - 1979
The
Fearless Vampire Killers (1967) was
directed by Roman Polanski and introduced
him to Sharon Tate.
Count
Dracula (1969 film), directed by Jesus
Franco starring Christopher Lee as
Dracula. While not a part of the Hammer
series some fans feel that it is close
to the spirit of the book.
In
1972, Paul Naschy starred in Dracula's
Great Love, directed by Javier Aguirre
for the Spanish production company
Janus Films. This movie predated the
vision of Dracula as a romantic character
to Francis Ford Coppola's by 20 years.
In
1973, a major television movie version
starring Jack Palance was produced
by Dan Curtis, best known for producing
the gothic soap opera Dark Shadows.
Filmed in Yugoslavia and England,
it was a fairly faithful and moody
piece.
In
1974, Andy Warhol presented an outrageously
campy Dracula (a.k.a. "Blood
for Dracula"), directed by Paul
Morrissey and starring cult icon Udo
Kier.
Dracula
Père et Fils 1976, Christopher
Lee French movie starring Christopher
Lee as Dracula
1977
saw a BBC version made for television
starring Louis Jourdan and directed
by Philip Saville. This version is
one of the more faithful adaptations
of the book. It includes all of the
main characters from the book (only
blending together Arthur and Quincey)
and has scenes of Jonathon recording
events in his diary and Dr. Seward
speaking into his dictaphone.
1977
also saw a revival of the 1927 broadway
version. The atmospheric sets and
costumes were designed by Edward Gorey.
The Count was portrayed by Frank Langella
and, like Lugosi before him, he would
go on to perform the role on the big
screen. The same Gorey sets and costumes
were used for a U.S. touring version
of the play starring Jeremy Brett.
The Deane-Balderston lines were altered
somewhat and played for a more comedic
effect.
In
1978, an independent film company
produced the horror thriller Zoltan,
Hound of Dracula starring Michael
Pataki as the mild-mannered family
psychiatrist destined to encounter
the resurrected hound of Dracula.
In
1979, Frank Langella starred opposite
Laurence Olivier as a sexually charged
version of the Count in a new film
version. It is considered of uneven
quality, though the John Williams
score is superb. That year also saw
the release of Love at First Bite,
a romantic comedy spoof set in contemporary
New York City starring George Hamilton
as the count.
Dracula
movies 1980 - 1999
In
1992, Francis Ford Coppola produced
and directed a new version of the
film, called Bram Stoker's Dracula
starring Gary Oldman, Winona Ryder,
Keanu Reeves, and Anthony Hopkins.
Coppola's story includes a subplot
in which Mina Harker was revealed
to be the reincarnation of Dracula's
greatest love. This story is not part
of Stoker's original. The soundtrack
includes 'Lovesong for a Vampire',
sung by Annie Lennox.
In
1995, Mel Brooks did a comedic parody,
Dracula: Dead and Loving It, which
parodied all of the standard Dracula
themes, but especially noteworthy
was the scene where Dracula's reflection
was noticeably absent in a mirror
as he danced at a ball, to the horror
of those watching. A scene where Van
Helsing has Harker pound a stake into
a sleeping Lucy's chest with a seemingly
impossible amount of blood spraying
back on himself asks the question:
just where does all the blood go?
Mel Brooks played Van Helsing as an
aged Professor. Dracula was played
by Leslie Nielsen.
Dracula
movies 2000 to present
Patrick
Lussier took a stab at the legend
with his modern day Dracula 2000,
promoted as Wes Craven Presents Dracula
2000. Wes Craven was an executive
producer. It was released in the UK
as Dracula 2001. To discover how to
destroy Dracula, Van Helsing (portrayed
by Christopher Plummer) keeps himself
alive with injections of Dracula's
blood. When thieves steal the vampire
and crash near New Orleans, Van Helsing
and his ward must track down the vampire
and save Van Helsing's daughter Mary.
In
2002, Canadian cult film director
Guy Maddin released his screen adaptation
of the Royal Winnipeg Ballet's version
of the count's tale, a ballet set
to the music of Gustav Mahler and
titled Dracula: Pages from a Virgin's
Diary. Mainly greyscale until Dracula
is cut and bleeds gold colloured coins.
The
character of Mina Harker appeared
in the 2003 film adaptation of the
graphic novel The League of Extraordinary
Gentlemen as a vampiric heroine played
by Peta Wilson.
Van
Helsing is a film based on the vampire-hunter
Van Helsing from the book, played
in this case by Hugh Jackman, only
reinvented as an immortal action hero
assigned by the Vatican to hunt monsters.
Richard Roxburgh portrays Dracula
in this reinvigoration of the 1930s
and 1940s Universal Horror monsters
which also featured new versions of
the Frankenstein Monster and The Wolf
Man. In this movie, Dracula is somewhat
of a super vampire, impervious to
the normal methods of killing a vampire.
A character
named Drake serves as the primary
antagonist in Blade: Trinity, in which
a group of vampires summon him in
order to finally defeat Blade. While
he is not confirmed directly to be
Dracula, Drake is implied to have
lived under several different aliases
and personalities, one of which may
have been the infamous vampire. Dominic
Purcell portrays Drake.
2005
saw the premiere of Dracula's most
recent play incarnation, an adaptation
by playwright P. Shane Mitchell. By
the end of 2005, the opera Dracula,
by the Colombian composer Héctor
Fabio Torres Cardona opened in Manizales,
Colombia. A French Canadian musical
production ("Dracula: Entre l'amour
et la mort" opened in Montreal
in January 2006, starring Bruno Pelletier.
HAUNTED
AMERICA TOURS Official Web Site
is a ghost tour information site;
our information is only as reliable
as readers' contributed ghost and
haunted reports. We assume no credit
for your adventures, and accept no
liability for your misadventures.
Use common sense. Read our ghost hunting
recommendations. Before visiting any
"haunted" site, verify the
location, accessibility, safety, and
other important information. Never
trespass on private and/or posted
property without permission from the
proper authorities.
WARNING
- if you received email that says its from "hauntedamericatours.com",
and has attachments, do not open them. They are not from Haunted
AmericaTours.com. hauntedamericatours.com never emails attachments
to anyone.
YOU SHOULD NEVER - EVER - OPEN EMAIL ATTACHMENTS!
[PLEASE NOTE: The articles released, posted,
published OR issued by haunredamericatours.com and/orhaunted America
Tours. Any errors, typos, etc. are attributed to the original author.
The Articles releasse or reproduced solely for the dissemination
of the enclosed information.]
Haunted America Tours does not send spam,
and will not sell your email address to anyone. Haunted America
Tours does not support or endorse any myspace.com pages including
spoof myspace pages claiming to be Haunted America Tours. If you
receive a friends request or any other contact regarding Haunted
America Tours on Myspace please disregard as we DO NOT maintain
any presence on myspace or any other Internet blogging sites.